Published August 2025 | Version Supplemental material
Journal Article Open

Inferring the Causal Structure Among Injection-Induced Seismicity with Linear Intensity Models

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology

Abstract

We present a method for earthquake causal attribution, which allows us to quantify the probability that an event is due to tectonic loading, a previous earthquake, or a fluid injection. The method is an extension of the stochastic declustering algorithm of Marsan and Lengliné (2008). Earthquake triggering is represented by nonparametric, mean-field kernels, which scale linearly with the seismic moment or hydraulic energy of the trigger. The kernels are estimated based on a linear intensity model via expectation–maximization, with uncertainties derived from Gaussian approximation of the incomplete-data likelihood. Some general implications of the resulting probabilistic causal structure, including an explicit algorithm to quantify the cascading effects, are illustrated. The estimators are validated using synthetic catalogs generated with an extended epidemic-type aftershock sequence model, which accounts for injection-induced earthquakes. Application to southern California seismicity and comparisons with the nearest-neighbor distance declustering method support the linearity assumption in the seismic moment. Application to seismicity related to CO2 injection in the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (for the period 2011–2014) reveals that 11% of the earthquakes were directly triggered by injection, 89% were due to previous earthquakes, whereas the contribution from tectonic loading was negligible (<1%). The earthquake interaction kernels in both cases show ∼1/t decay in time and indicate triggering by elastic static stress transfer; the injection kernels in the Decatur case suggest pore-pressure diffusion as a more likely mechanism than poroelasticity. The Gutenberg–Richter b-value is estimated to be larger for anthropogenic events (∼1.4) than natural ones (∼1.0). Deviations from the model suggest spatial anisotropy of earthquake interaction in both natural and induced settings.

Copyright and License

© 2025 Seismological Society of America.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank David Marsan, one anonymous reviewer, Editor‐in‐Chief Martin Mai, and Associate Editor Jiancang Zhuang for their constructive comments and suggestions that helped significantly improve the quality of this article. The authors also thank Taeho Kim, Krittanon Sirorattanakul, and Stephen Bourne for numerous discussions. When developing the codes appropriate to this study, the authors used the original versions of the model‐independent stochastic declustering algorithm provided by David Marsan and Olivier Lengliné, the nearest‐neighbor distance (NND) algorithm provided by Ilya Zaliapin, and the epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) simulator provided by Karen Felzer. This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) via the Industry‐University Collaborative Research Center Geomechanics and Mitigation of Geohazards (Award Number 1822214).

 

Data Availability

The updated catalog of Hauksson et al. (2012) is available on the Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCEDC) website (https://scedc.caltech.edu/data/alt-2011-dd-hauksson-yang-shearer.html, last accessed June 2024). Hourly injection data and well design information of CCS1 at the Decatur site are available at https://edx.netl.doe.gov/group/illinois-basin-decatur-project (last accessed January 2023). The relocated microseismicity catalog of Dando et al. (2021) is available at https://co2datashare.org/dataset/illinois-basin-decatur-project-dataset/resource/6eecec43-a77a-410c-a8c7-6fec1465d9b8 (last accessed January 2023). Locations of active faults in southern California (Figs. 5a7a,c) were obtained from https://github.com/GEMScienceTools/gem-global-active-faults (last accessed August 2024). The codes for this study were developed with MATLAB (www.mathworks.com/products/matlab, last accessed August 2024) and are available at the CaltechDATA repository (doi: 10.22002/qs31t-bem92). The supplemental material for this article includes additional figures on the applications of the causal attribution algorithm to southern California and Decatur seismicity.

 

Supplemental Material

bssa-2024233_supplement

Files

bssa-2024233_supplement.pdf

Files (1.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8b59a8d9820b65041b806623a44e506d
1.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplemented by
Software: 10.22002/qs31t-bem92 (DOI)

Funding

National Science Foundation
1822214

Dates

Available
2025-03-18
First online

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Center for Geomechanics and Mitigation of Geohazards (GMG), Seismological Laboratory, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS)
Publication Status
Published