Published August 26, 2024 | Version Published
Journal Article Open

Multidimensional hierarchical tests of general relativity with gravitational waves

  • 1. ROR icon University of Minnesota
  • 2. ROR icon Flatiron Institute
  • 3. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 4. ROR icon Stony Brook University

Abstract

Tests of general relativity with gravitational waves typically introduce parameters for putative deviations and combine information from multiple events by characterizing the population distribution of these parameters through a hierarchical model. Although many tests include multiple such parameters, hierarchical tests have so far been unable to accommodate this multidimensionality, instead restricting to separate one-dimensional analyses and discarding information about parameter correlations. In this paper, we extend population tests of general relativity to handle an arbitrary number of dimensions. We demonstrate this framework on the two-dimensional inspiral-merger-ringdown consistency test, and derive new constraints from the latest LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA catalog, GWTC-3. We obtain joint constraints for the two parameters introduced by the classic formulation of this test, revealing their correlation structure both at the individual-event and population levels. We additionally propose a new four-dimensional formulation of the inspiral-merger-ringdown test that we show contains further information. As in past work, we find the GW190814 event to be an outlier; the 4D analysis yields further insights on how the low mass and spin of this event biases the population results. Without (with) this event, we find consistency with general relativity at the 60% (92%) credible level in the 2D formulation, and 76% (80%) for the 4D formulation. This multidimensional framework can be immediately applied to other tests of general relativity in any number of dimensions, including the parametrized post-Einsteinian tests and ringdown tests.

Copyright and License

© 2024 American Physical Society.

Acknowledgement

We thank Geraint Pratten for feedback on this manuscript. The authors are grateful for computational resources provided by the LIGO Laboratory under NSF Grants PHY-0757058 and PHY-0823459. This material is based upon work supported by NSF’s LIGO Laboratory which is a major facility fully funded by the National Science Foundation. H.Z. was supported by NSF Grant DGE-1922512. The Flatiron Institute is funded by the Simons Foundation. K.C. was supported by NSF Grant PHY-2110111. This paper carries LIGO document number LIGO-P2400214.

Files

PhysRevD.110.044053.pdf

Files (5.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:019c28a9c246ec99ef0c52df88d59927
5.6 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is new version of
Discussion Paper: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.19556 (DOI)

Funding

National Science Foundation
PHY-0757058
National Science Foundation
PHY-0823459
National Science Foundation
DGE-1922512
Simons Foundation
National Science Foundation
PHY-2110111

Dates

Accepted
2024-08-02
Accepted
Available
2024-08-26
Published online

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
LIGO, Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy (PMA)
Other Numbering System Name
LIGO
Other Numbering System Identifier
P2400214
Publication Status
Published