The oxidation of atmospheric methane by soil microbes is an important natural sink for a potent greenhouse gas. However, estimates of the current and future soil methane sink are highly uncertain. Here we assessed the extent to which methanotrophy enzyme kinetics contribute to uncertainty in projections of the soil methane sink. We generated a comprehensive compilation of methanotrophy kinetic data from modern environments and assessed the patterns in kinetic parameters present in natural samples. Our compiled data enabled us to quantify the global soil methane sink through two idealized calculations comparing first-order and Michaelis–Menten models of kinetics. We show that these two kinetic models diverge only under high atmospheric CH4 scenarios, where first-order rate constants slightly overestimate the soil methane sink size, but produce similar predictions at modern atmospheric concentrations. Our compilation also shows that the kinetics of methanotrophy in natural soil samples is highly variable—both the Vmax (oxidation rate at saturation) and KM (half-saturation constant) in natural samples span over six orders of magnitude. However, accounting for the correlation we observe between Vmax and KM reduces the range of calculated uptake rates by as much as 96%. Additionally, our results indicate that variation in enzyme kinetics introduces a similar magnitude of variation in the calculated soil methane sink as temperature sensitivity. Systematic sampling of methanotroph kinetic parameters at multiple spatial scales should therefore be a key objective for closing the budget on the global soil methane sink.
Evaluating the contribution of methanotrophy kinetics to uncertainty in the soil methane sink
Abstract
Copyright and License
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing.
Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Acknowledgement
This project was supported by the Resnick Sustainability Institute at Caltech and the Center for Environmental-Microbial Interactions at Caltech. We express our gratitude to Benjamin Poulter, Xiaojing (Ruby) Fu, Adrian Moure, Avi Flamholz, Joshua Goldford, and Tapio Schneider for helpful discussions of early results, to Joshua Anadu for assistance with data visualization, to three anonymous reviewers for insightful suggestions for improving this work, and to Christopher Cappa and three reviewers for constructive feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Data Availability
All data that support the findings of this study are included within the article (and any supplementary files). The compiled dataset is additionally available on Zenodo at doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11225342.
Additional Information
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:1a73e11da88630d0c13d0d5ab7f8157b
|
1.5 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Resnick Sustainability Institute
- Caltech Center for Environmental-Microbial Interactions
- Caltech groups
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, Resnick Sustainability Institute, Caltech Center for Environmental Microbial Interactions (CEMI)