Published July 2023 | Published
Journal Article Open

Breakups are complicated: an efficient representation of collisional breakup in the superdroplet method

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 2. ROR icon Scripps Institution of Oceanography
  • 3. ROR icon Jagiellonian University
  • 4. ROR icon AGH University of Science and Technology
  • 5. ROR icon University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

A key constraint of particle-based methods for modeling cloud microphysics is the conservation of total particle number, which is required for computational tractability. The process of collisional breakup poses a particular challenge to this framework, as breakup events often produce many droplet fragments of varying sizes, which would require creating new particles in the system. This work introduces a representation of collisional breakup in the so-called “superdroplet” method which conserves the total number of superdroplets in the system. This representation extends an existing stochastic collisional-coalescence scheme and samples from a fragment size distribution in an additional Monte Carlo step. This method is demonstrated in a set of idealized box model and single-column warm-rain simulations. We further discuss the effects of the breakup dynamic and fragment size distribution on the particle size distribution, hydrometeor population, and microphysical process rates. Box model experiments serve to characterize the impacts of properties such as coalescence efficiency and fragmentation function on the relative roles of collisional breakup and coalescence. The results demonstrate that this representation of collisional breakup can produce a stationary particle size distribution, in which breakup and coalescence rates are approximately equal, and that it recovers expected behavior such as a reduction in precipitate-sized particles in the column model. The breakup algorithm presented here contributes to an open-source pythonic implementation of the superdroplet method, PySDM, which will facilitate future research using particle-based microphysics.

Copyright and License

© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Funding

Emily de Jong was supported by a Department of Energy Computational Science Graduate Fellowship. Sylwester Arabas and Oleksii Bulenok were supported by the Polish National Science Centre (grant no. 2020/39/D/ST10/01220). This research was additionally supported by Eric and Wendy Schmidt (by recommendation of Schmidt Futures) and the Heising-Simons Foundation.

Acknowledgement

We thank Tapio Schneider and Shin-ichiro Shima for feedback, insights, and discussion. The study benefited from peer-review comments provided by Axel Seifert, Christoph Siewert, and two anonymous reviewers. Additional thanks go to Piotr Bartman for ongoing support of PySDM.

Code Availability

Implementation of this breakup algorithm in the SDM is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7851352 (Arabas et al.2023a). The simulations presented in this work (and all necessary input information) are available in the folder “deJong_Mackay_2022” at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7851288 (Arabas et al.2023b). The notebooks in this folder reproduce all results and figures presented in this study, with no external datasets required. The scripts run the relevant model configuration in a matter of minutes and plot the resulting output. All results presented in this paper can be reproduced by one of two means: (1) downloading and installing “PySDM” and “PySDM-examples” (e.g., using “pip install”) and running the notebooks locally or (2) accessing the PySDM-examples repository online and running the examples notebooks in the folder “deJong_Mackay_2022” on Google Colab. These codes, PySDM and PySDM-examples, are continuously under development at https://github.com/atmos-cloud-sim-uj/PySDM and https://github.com/atmos-cloud-sim-uj/PySDM-examples (last access: 21 April 2023) and are further documented in a software publication (de Jong et al.2023).

Conflict of Interest

At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Geoscientific Model Development. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.

Files

gmd-16-4193-2023.pdf
Files (5.4 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:178424c5f47c3d71505e40f5bdfeb575
5.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
May 15, 2025
Modified:
May 15, 2025