Water recycling public toilets based on onsite electrochemical wastewater treatment
Abstract
The long-term performance of an anaerobic bioreactor combined with electrochemical oxidation and integrated into a self-contained public bathroom under daily use was investigated over 14 months in Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu, India). With varying daily number of users and across all seasons, the electrochemical treatment of the bioreactor effluent consistently generated a highly chlorinated (>400 mg Cl₂ per L) and clear effluent that was negative to a fecal coliform assay. During 8 months of testing under water recycling conditions, the treatment maintained its performance for disinfection, as well as solid and nitrogen removal, due to breakpoint chlorination; however, the COD removal capacity of the system was slightly reduced. The strongly oxidizing condition of this electrochemical based disinfection raised the concern of generation of toxic disinfection byproducts (DPBs). This study also examined the formation of chloroform and haloacetic acid DBPs under non-recycling and recycling conditions.
Copyright and License
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
Acknowledgement
We gratefully acknowledge PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore for supporting the test site installation and operation on their campus. This work was supported, in whole or in part, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation grant INV001513 to Duke University and grants INV003227 and INV047212 to Caltech. Under the grant conditions of the Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assigned to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission.
Contributions
PS: investigation, data curation, writing – original draft; MB: investigation, data curation, visualization; PR: investigation, data curation, visualization, writing – original draft; DRJ: resources; VC: investigation, data curation, writing – original draft; JR: methodology; LP: conceptualization, validation, writing – review & editing; KC: formal analysis, validation; CW: validation, visualization; SG: conceptualization, validation, writing – original draft, project administration; CC: conceptualization, validation, writing – review & editing, supervision.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests.
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:0ae258d998710a423d03c6473d6ba9f9
|
1.4 MB | Preview Download |
md5:c314e8900972be65d87d57da0e618dd7
|
2.6 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- ISSN
- 2053-1419
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- INV001513
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- INV003227
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- INV047212