Published May 1, 2021 | Version Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

The uranium isotopic record of shales and carbonates through geologic time

  • 1. ROR icon University of Chicago
  • 2. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 3. ROR icon University of California, Riverside
  • 4. ROR icon University of Johannesburg
  • 5. ROR icon Carnegie Institution for Science
  • 6. ROR icon McGill University
  • 7. ROR icon University of Ottawa

Abstract

In the modern ocean, U reduction and incorporation into anoxic sediments imparts a large isotopic fractionation of approximately +0.6‰ that shifts the seawater δ²³⁸U value (²³⁸U/²³⁵U, expressed as δ²³⁸U per mil deviation relative to CRM-112a) relative to continental runoff. Given the long residence time of U in the modern oceans (∼400 kyr), the isotopic composition of carbonates (taken as a proxy for seawater) reflects the global balance between anoxic and other sinks. The U isotopic composition of open-marine carbonates has thus emerged as a proxy for reconstructing past changes in the redox state of the global ocean. A tenet of this approach is that the δ²³⁸U values of seawater and anoxic sediments should always be fractionated by the same amount. In order to test this hypothesis, we have measured the U concentrations and isotopic compositions of carbonates spanning ages from 3250 Ma to present. A first-order expectation for the Archean and possibly Proterozoic is that near-quantitative U removal to extensive anoxic sediments should have shifted the uranium isotopic composition of seawater and carbonates towards lower values. Instead, the measurements reveal that many Archean and Proterozoic carbonates have unfractionated δ²³⁸U values similar to those of continents and riverine runoff. These results are inconsistent with the view that the U isotopic composition of seawater simply reflects the areal extent of anoxic sediments in the past. We consider two plausible explanations for why the U isotopic composition of Archean and Proterozoic carbonates is not fractionated from the crustal and riverine composition: (1) the residence time of U could have been much shorter in the Precambrian oceans when anoxic settings were much more extensive, and (2) the process of incorporation of U into anoxic sediments in the Precambrian imparted a smaller U isotopic fractionation than in the modern because of differences in the efficiency or mechanism of uranium removal. This study highlights the challenges inherent to applying knowledge of the modern marine U isotopic cycle to periods of Earth's history when ocean-floor anoxia was much more extended, anoxic basins were ferruginous, and atmospheric oxygen content was significantly lower than present.

Additional Information

© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. Received 17 October 2019, Revised 21 January 2021, Accepted 25 January 2021, Available online 3 February 2021. This work was supported by NASA grants NNX17AE86G (LARS), NNX17AE87G and 80NSSC20K0821 (Emerging Worlds), and 80NSSC17K0744 (Habitable Worlds), and NSF grant EAR-2001098 (CSEDI) to ND; ACS Petroleum Research Fund grant 52964 to FT and ND; NSERC Discovery and Accelerator grants to AB; National Science Foundation (NSF OCE-1846821) to MFJ. Discussions with Andrew Heard, Clara Blättler and Jacob Waldbauer are greatly appreciated. We thank C. Stirling for her editorial handling of the manuscript and T.W. Dahl and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that helped improve the quality of the manuscript. Author contributions: Dauphas, Tissot, Chen, and Bekker conceived the project. Tissot, Bekker, Halverson, and Veizer made the sample selection. Chen performed the U isotopic analyses. Liu, Chen, and Dauphas modeled the influence of anoxia on U residence time. Nie modeled U speciation in seawater. Jansen evaluated the effects of the different forcing factors on the ocean mixing timescale in the Archean. Chen, Dauphas, and Jansen wrote the first draft of the manuscript, which was edited by all the co-authors. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - 1-s2.0-S0016703721000661-mmc1.pdf

Supplemental Material - 1-s2.0-S0016703721000661-mmc2.xlsx

Files

1-s2.0-S0016703721000661-mmc1.pdf

Files (2.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5aab04b453ab25a30e43c64c8a535977
1.7 MB Preview Download
md5:7085a1854f5dfe5ea30ff562ebc0acae
334.3 kB Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
107894
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20210203-153225881

Funding

NASA
NNX17AE86G
NASA
NNX17AE87G
NASA
80NSSC20K0821
NASA
80NSSC17K0744
NSF
EAR-2001098
American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund
52964
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
NSF
OCE-1846821

Dates

Created
2021-02-04
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-16
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS)