Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published May 28, 2014 | public
Journal Article

Nonresponse and Mode Effects in Self- and Interviewer-Administered Surveys


We examine the quality of two probability-based polls, one interviewer administered (telephone) and one self-administered (Internet and mail mixed mode survey). The polls use the same sampling frame (registered voters) and the same questions. First, we examine the representativeness of both surveys using information known about the population, and although we find important differences between the two in terms of sampling and nonresponse bias, we also find that both surveys represent the underlying population despite low response rates. We also test for mode effects between surveys due to social desirability and how it influences nondifferentiation or satisficing. Using a variety of methods (t-tests, multivariate regression, and genetic propensity matching), we find evidence that the presence of an interviewer alters response patterns on ego-driven questions. The implications of our work are important, due to the increasing popularity of mixed mode surveys. Researchers need to be methodologically sensitive to these differences when analyzing surveys that allow for different response modes.

Additional Information

© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology. All rights reserved. Edited by Jasjeet Sekhon. Advance Access publication May 28, 2014. Funding for this research was provided by the Pew Charitable Trusts' Center on the States and the JEHT Foundation's Make Voting Work Initiative.

Additional details

August 20, 2023
October 17, 2023