Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published September 15, 2024 | Published
Journal Article Open

Experimental constraints on iron and sulfur redox equilibria and kinetics in basaltic melt inclusions

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 2. ROR icon University of Edinburgh
  • 3. ROR icon University of California, Riverside
  • 4. ROR icon GNS Science
  • 5. ROR icon Jet Propulsion Lab

Abstract

The oxidation states of dissolved iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) in silicate melts were studied experimentally by heating Hawaiian olivines containing S-bearing melt inclusions (MIs) in a 1 atm gas-mixing furnace. The MIs are closed with respect to S and C, but equilibrate with the oxygen fugacity (ƒO2) and water fugacity (ƒH2O) of the furnace. We also conducted experiments using a S-free synthetic Hawaiian MI composition held on Pt-loops. Experiments were run at 1225 °C for 8–96 hr in H2-CO2 gas mixtures corresponding to ƒO2 values that varied over seven orders of magnitude and then drop-quenched into water. Time-series experiments show that MI Fe3+/Fe2+ and S6+/S2− ratios reached constant values within ∼24 hr. The H2O contents of the Pt-loop glasses and the dehydrated MIs overlap and are proportional to the √fH2O in the furnace gas. The slope of log10(Fe3+/Fe2+) vs. log10ƒO2 is 0.25±0.02(2σ) for the Pt-loop glasses and 0.23±0.01(2σ) for the quenched MIs; the slopes of the two sets of experiments are consistent with equilibrium having been reached via the reaction FeO + ¼ O2 = FeO1.5. S-bearing quenched MI glasses have Fe3+/Fe2+ ratios that are systematically low compared to ratios measured in the S-free Pt-loop glasses run at the same T and ƒO2; this may reflect an effect of S on Fe3+/Fe2+, although further experiments are needed to explore this possibility. S6+/S2− ratios in the experimental melt inclusions vary systematically as a function of ƒO2, and the measured ratios agree with independent calculations of S oxidation state in basaltic melts.

After being held at 1225 °C for 24 or 48 hr, a subset of olivine-hosted MIs were cooled at rates of 1700–40,000 °C/hr and quenched at temperatures between 900 °C and 1150 °C to explore whether Fe and S speciation are modified during cooling. Fe and S speciation in isothermal and cooled MIs held initially at the same ƒO2 overlap within uncertainty, suggesting that the T dependence of the homogeneous reaction 8Fe3+ + S2− = 8Fe2+ + S6+ is small and/or its kinetics are sluggish relative to cooling rates required to quench basaltic liquids to glasses. The centers of unheated, naturally quenched MIs from Papakōlea, Hawaii with syneruptive cooling rates ranging from ∼50 to 12,000 °C/hr were also measured for Fe and S speciation. MIs that experienced the lowest cooling rates have higher Fe3+/Fe2+ and S6+/S2− ratios relative to rapidly cooled inclusions of comparable size. The increase in Fe3+/Fe2+ is due to olivine crystallization on the inclusion walls during cooling and diffusion of the resulting oxidized boundary layer into MI interiors. Diffusive modification is minimized in MIs that have been rapidly cooled and/or are sufficiently large such that the oxidized boundary layer is restricted to a narrow region adjacent to the inclusion walls. Our experiments and their comparison to naturally quenched MIs show that measurements of Fe3+/Fe2+ and S6+/S2− ratios in quenched basaltic glasses and in the centers of rapidly cooled and/or large MIs are likely to be representative of the redox state in the melt at magmatic temperatures prior to quenching to glass.

Copyright and License

© 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

Acknowledgement

This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. A portion of this work was performed by an employee (AEH) of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004). ECH was supported by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) through the Hazards and Risk Management program (Strategic Science Investment Fund, contract C05X1702).
We would like to thank the beamline staff at the Argonne National Laboratory, GSECARS beamline 13-IDE for their help with XANES analysis, especially during sessions run remotely due to Covid-19. We thank Mary Peterson for her help in running XANES sessions in 2018 and 2019, Chi Ma at Caltech for his help with EPMA measurements, Yunbin Guan at Caltech for his help with ion probe measurements, and Reid Cooper, David Kohlstedt, Liz Cottrell, and Michelle Muth for useful conversations that helped to improve various aspects of the manuscript. Finally, we would like to thank Bernie Wood and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback.

Funding

This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. A portion of this work was performed by an employee (AEH) of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004). ECH was supported by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) through the Hazards and Risk Management program (Strategic Science Investment Fund, contract C05X1702).

Contributions

L.M. Saper: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Conceptualization. M.B. Baker: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. M. Brounce: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. E.C. Hughes: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. A.E. Hofmann: Methodology. E.M. Stolper: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Conceptualization.

Data Availability

All data are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13128931.

Files

1-s2.0-S0016703724003648-mmc1.pdf
Files (17.1 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:2b5d671849621196c453d10ad83b37bb
2.3 MB Preview Download
md5:4f81a684a308525536c09e0d0ac7e197
128.7 kB Download
md5:9fbd1bd1ab031ee7032d5c6eb2d5a35b
14.6 MB Download
md5:c70dea0ff7b2cd820cacb37cdd1840c6
12.9 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
September 18, 2024
Modified:
September 30, 2024