Regional Inversion Shows Promise in Capturing Extreme‐Event‐Driven CO₂ Flux Anomalies but Is Limited by Atmospheric CO₂ Observational Coverage
Abstract
Extreme climate events are becoming more frequent, with poorly understood implications for carbon sequestration by terrestrial ecosystems. A better understanding will critically depend on accurate and precise quantification of ecosystems responses to these events. Taking the 2019 US Midwest floods as a case study, we investigate current capabilities for tracking regional flux anomalies with “top-down” inversion analyses that assimilate atmospheric CO2 observations. For this analysis, we develop a regionally nested version of the NASA Carbon Monitoring System-Flux system for North America (CMS-Flux-NA) that allows high resolution atmospheric transport (0.5° × 0.625°). Relative to a 2018 baseline, we find the 2019 US Midwest growing season net carbon uptake is reduced by 11–57 TgC (3%–16%, range across assimilated CO2 data sets). These estimates are found to be consistent with independent “bottom-up” estimates of carbon uptake based on vegetation remote sensing (15–78 TgC). We then investigate current limitations in tracking regional carbon budgets using “top-down” methods. In a set of observing system simulation experiments, we show that the ability of atmospheric CO2 inversions to capture regional carbon flux anomalies is still limited by observational coverage gaps for both in situ and satellite observations. Future space-based missions that allow for daily observational coverage across North America would largely mitigate these observational gaps, allowing for improved top-down estimates of ecosystem responses to extreme climate events.
Copyright and License
© 2024 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology and The Authors. Government sponsorship acknowledged. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative CommonsA ttribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Copyright and License
The research carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, was under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Funding for the research was from the NASA CMS (Grants 80NSSC21K1060, 80NM0018F0583) and OCO science team (Grant 80NM0018F0583) programs. J.X. was supported by the National Science Foundation (Macrosystem Biology and NEON-Enabled Science program: DEB-2017870). Resources supporting this work were provided by the NASA High-End Computing program through the NASA Advanced Supercomputing Division at Ames Research Center. ⓒ 2023. All rights reserved. California Institute of Technology, government sponsorship acknowledged.
Data Availability
The prior and posterior fluxes as well as aircraft CO2 co-samples are archived by Byrne et al. (2024). The atmospheric CO2 inversion analyses performed in this study used the CMS-Flux model, which is based on the GEOS-Chem Adjoint model that can be accessed from the GEOS-Chem Wiki (https://wiki.seas.harvard.edu/geos-chem). OCO-2 XCO2 Lite files can be downloaded from the GES DISC (https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov). In Situ CO2 measurements (Schuldt et al., 2022) can be downloaded from https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/obspack/. GFED biomass burning emissions (van der Werf et al., 2017) were downloaded from https://globalfiredata.org/. Fossil fuel emissions (Basu & Nassar, 2021) were downloaded from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4776925. MERRA-2 reanalysis data (Gelaro et al., 2017) was downloaded from https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/. TROPOMI SIF data are accessed online at https://data.caltech.edu/records/1347 (https://doi.org/10.22002/D1.1347). FluxSat Version 2 (Joiner & Yoshida, 2021) were downloaded from the ORNL DAAC (https://daac.ornl.gov). GOSIF GPP (Li & Xiao, 2019) were downloaded from http://data.globalecology.unh.edu/. FLUXCOM GPP (Jung et al., 2020) was downloaded from the aata portal of the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/geodb/projects/Home.php).
Additional Information
This article also appears in:
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:874e78ef259a05239b917c2a668ac5b5
|
7.9 MB | Preview Download |
md5:b2ab04b5fb8291f937352e9060dfc5dc
|
2.1 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- ISSN
- 2169-8996
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- 80NSSC21K1060
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- 80NM0018F0583
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- 80NM0018F0583
- National Science Foundation
- DEB-2017870