Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 2024 | Published
Journal Article Open

Occurrence Rates of Exosatellites Orbiting 3–30 M_(Jup) Hosts from 44 Spitzer Light Curves

Abstract

We conduct a comprehensive search for transiting exomoons and exosatellites within 44 archival Spitzer light curves of 32 substellar worlds with estimated masses ranging between 3 and 30 MJup. This sample's median host mass is 16 MJup, inclusive of 14 planetary-mass objects, among which one is a wide-orbit exoplanet. We search the light curves for exosatellite signatures and implement a transit injection-recovery test, illustrating our survey's capability to detect >0.7 R exosatellites. Our findings reveal no substantial (>5σ) evidence for individual transit events. However, an unusual fraction of light curves favor the transit model at the 2–3σ significance level, with fitted transit depths consistent with terrestrial-sized (0.7–1.6 R) bodies. Comparatively, fewer than 2.2% of randomly generated normal distributions from an equivalent sample size exhibit a similar prevalence of outliers. Should one or two of these outliers represent a real exosatellite transit, it would imply an occurrence rate of 𝜂 = 0.61_(−0.34)^(+0.49) short-period terrestrial exosatellites per system, consistent with the known occurrences rates for both solar system moons and mid-M dwarf exoplanets. We explore alternative astrophysical interpretations for these outliers, underscoring that transits are not the only plausible explanation. For orbital periods <0.8 days, the typical duration of the light curves, we constrain the occurrence rate of sub-Neptunes to η < 0.35 (95% confidence) and, if none of the detected outlier signals are real, the occurrence rate of terrestrial (∼Earth-sized) exosatellites to η < 0.51 (95% confidence). Forthcoming JWST observations of substellar light curves will enable the detection of sub-Io-sized exosatellites, allowing for much stronger constraints on this exosatellite population.

Acknowledgement

© 2024. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the anonymous reviewer for a thorough and helpful review of this manuscript. This research has made use of the NASA Exoplanet Archive, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under the Exoplanet Exploration Program. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. J.M.V. acknowledges support from a Royal Society—Science Foundation Ireland University Research Fellowship (URF\1\221932).

Facilities

Spitzer - Spitzer Space Telescope satellite, Gaia - , WISE - Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, 2MASS - , IRTF - Infrared Telescope Facility

Software References

SEDkit (Filippazzo et al. 2015), astro.py Astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 201320182022), numpy.py (van der Walt et al. 2011), dynesty.py (Speagle 2020), corner.py (Foreman-Mackey 2016) and ChatGPT was utilized to improve wording at the sentence level, answer coding inquires and to convert tables to LATEX; Last accessed in 2024 January, OpenAI (chat.openai.com/chat)

Files

Limbach_2024_AJ_168_54.pdf
Files (1.3 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:4a9103ca8ef20aaec7155c7bb9a54043
1.3 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
July 8, 2024
Modified:
July 8, 2024