Published April 2024 | Version Published
Journal Article

The deterrence effect of M&A regulatory enforcements

  • 1. ROR icon Norwegian School of Economics
  • 2. ROR icon University of Lille
  • 3. ROR icon Loyola Marymount University
  • 4. ROR icon California Institute of Technology

Abstract

Economic, political, and public policy uncertainty affect merger and acquisition (M&A) activity. In this paper, we use Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) interventions in the M&A market to investigate whether regulatory interventions also matter. Our results support this conjecture. Using the Hoberg and Phillips (2010) similarity scores to identify product market competitors, we confirm a clear and significant DOJ/FTC regulatory enforcements' deterrence effect on future M&A transaction activity, a result robust to many alternative specifications. Additional evidence indicates that this deterrence effect is (at least partly) driven by both regulatory outcome uncertainty and regulatory intervention probability channels. Our results identify an (un)intended consequence of antitrust regulation that affects M&A activity.

Copyright and License

© 2024 Elsevier B.V.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Gregory Eaton, Feng Guo, and Tingting Liu for giving us access to their hand-gathered sample of valuation peers (from Eaton, Guo, Liu, and Officer, 2021). We thank Andrey Golubov, participants of the 6th Annual Conference MARC at Bayes Business School (London, 2022), 2021 Paris Finance Meeting (Eurofidai), the Hong Kong Baptist University Finance Seminar, the University of Missouri Robert Trulaske College of Business Finance Seminar, and anonymous referees for useful comments and suggestions.

Additional details

Dates

Accepted
2024-02-09
Available
2024-02-12
Available online
Available
2024-02-17
Version of record

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS)
Publication Status
Published