The Approximation of Efficient Public Good Mechanisms by Simple Voting Schemes
- Creators
- Ledyard, John O.
- Palfrey, Thomas R.
Abstract
This paper compares the performance of simple voting rules, called referenda, to the performance of interim efficient mechanisms for the provision of a public good. In a referendum, voters simply vote for or against the provision of the public good, and production of the public good depends on whether or not the number of yes votes exceeds a prespecified threshold. Costs are shared equally. We show that in large populations for any interim efficient allocation rule, there exists a corresponding referendum that yields approximately the same total welfare when there are many individuals. Moreover, if there is a common value component to the voters' preferences, then there is a unique approximating referendum.
Additional Information
Revised version. Original version dated to August 1999. This is a revision of a paper entitled "Voting is Approximately Optimal." We are grateful for the support of the National Science Foundation and of the New Millennium Program of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory of NASA. The second author is grateful for the hospitality and research support at LEI-CREST. We thank two anonymous referees for their comments. Published as Ledyard, John O. and Palfrey, Thomas R. (2002) The approximation of efficient public good mechanisms by simple voting schemes. Journal of Public Economics, 83 (2). pp. 153-171.Attached Files
Submitted - sswp1092_-_revised.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:91d7ab11cd788ca42b17abea397d32ce
|
362.4 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 79952
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20170808-142250579
- NSF
- JPL
- Created
-
2017-08-09Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2019-11-22Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Social Science Working Papers
- Series Name
- Social Science Working Paper
- Series Volume or Issue Number
- 1092