Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 2024 | Published
Journal Article Open

A Model for Thaw and Erosion of Permafrost Riverbanks

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology

Abstract

How will bank erosion rates in Arctic rivers respond to a warming climate? Existing physical models predict that bank erosion rates should increase with water temperature as permafrost thaws more rapidly. However, the same theory predicts much faster erosion than is typically observed. We propose that these models are missing a key component: a layer of thawed sediment on the bank that buffers heat transfer and slows erosion. We developed a 1D model for this thawed layer, which reveals three regimes for permafrost riverbank erosion. Thaw-limited erosion occurs in the absence of a thawed layer, such that rapid pore-ice melting sets the pace of erosion, consistent with existing models. Entrainment-limited erosion occurs when pore-ice melting outpaces bank erosion, resulting in a thawed layer, and the relatively slow entrainment of sediment sets the pace of erosion similar to non-permafrost rivers. Third, the intermediate regime occurs when the thawed layer goes through cycles of thickening and failure, leading to a transient thermal buffer that slows thaw rates. Distinguishing between these regimes is important because thaw-limited erosion is highly sensitive to water temperature, whereas entrainment-limited erosion is not. Interestingly, the buffered regime produces a thawed layer and relatively slow erosion rates like the entrainment-limited regime, but erosion rates are temperature sensitive like the thaw-limited regime. The results suggest the potential for accelerating erosion in a warming Arctic where bank erosion is presently thaw-limited or buffered. Moreover, rivers can experience all regimes annually and transition between regimes with warming, altering their sensitivity to climate change.

Copyright and License

© 2024. American Geophysical Union.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Koyukon Athabascans, Chief Carl Burgett, and the Huslia Tribal Council for access to their land, and USFWS Koyukuk National Wildlife Refuge for research permitting and logistical assistance. We acknowledge Shawn Huffman, Alvin Attla, Darin Dayton, Charlene Mayo, Mary Ann Sam, and Virgil Umphenour for field logistical support and local expertise. We would also like to thank Rain Blankenship, Austin Chadwick, Hannah Dion-Kirshner, Kieran Dunne, Emily Geyman, Yutian Ke, Preston C. Kemeny, Gen K. Li, John Magyar, Edda Mutter, Justin Nghiem, Anastasia Piliouras, Jocelyn Reahl, Joel Rowland, Jon Schwenk, Emily Seelen, Isabel Smith, Josh West, and Lisa Winter for assistance in collecting field data; Kim Litwin Miller, Bill Dietrich, Chris Paola, and the Caltech 2018 Ge126 course for fruitful discussions; and editor Marisa Repasch as well as Kun Zhao and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback. In addition, the authors acknowledge funding from the Resnick Sustainability Institute at Caltech, NSF Awards 2127442 and 2031532, and the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship.

Data Availability

Data for permafrost probe measurements are available in the Supporting Information and at Douglas, Blankenship, et al. (2023). Soil bulk density and water content data are available from Douglas et al. (2022). Data for ground temperature at Huslia (site ID US O-82) from the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost (GTN-P) Database from Biskaborn et al. (2015). Model scripts are available at M. M. Douglas (2023).

Supporting information S1

Files

JGR Earth Surface - 2024 - Douglas - A Model for Thaw and Erosion of Permafrost Riverbanks.pdf

Additional details

Created:
June 14, 2024
Modified:
June 14, 2024