Visual context affects the perceived timing of tactile sensations elicited through intra-cortical microstimulation
Abstract
Intra-cortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a technique to provide tactile sensations for a somatosensory brain-machine interface (BMI). A viable BMI must function within the rich, multisensory environment of the real world, but how ICMS is integrated with other sensory modalities is poorly understood. To investigate how ICMS percepts are integrated with visual information, ICMS and visual stimuli were delivered at varying times relative to one another. Both visual context and ICMS current amplitude were found to bias the qualitative experience of ICMS. In two tetraplegic participants, ICMS and visual stimuli were more likely to be experienced as occurring simultaneously when visual stimuli were more realistic, demonstrating an effect of visual context on the temporal binding window. The peak of the temporal binding window varied but was consistently offset from zero, suggesting that multisensory integration with ICMS can suffer from temporal misalignment. Recordings from primary somatosensory cortex (S1) during catch trials where visual stimuli were delivered without ICMS demonstrated that S1 represents visual information related to ICMS across visual contexts.
Copyright and License
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Acknowledgement
We thank the participants of this study for their effort and dedication to the study, and S. Wandelt and W. Griggs for helpful discussions and insights.
Funding
This research was supported by the T&C Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center, the Boswell Foundation, NIH/NRSA grant T32 NS105595, and NIH/NINDS grant U01NS123127.
Contributions
I.A.R., L.B., D.B., and R.A.A. designed the study. I.A.R. developed the experimental tasks. I.A.R., L.B., and D.B. collected data. I.A.R. analyzed the results. I.A.R., L.B., and D.B. interpreted the results. I.A.R. wrote the paper. I.A.R., L.B., D. B., and R.A.A. reviewed and edited the paper. K.P. coordinated regulatory requirements of clinical trials. C.L. and B.L. performed the surgery to implant the microelectrode arrays.
Data Availability
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:4a63c12dad4c6437d87516294dbdf590
|
2.6 MB | Preview Download |
md5:adfd31292cb721782407e6dd55fbf557
|
4.5 MB | Download |
md5:368533e2af8db88ca94d982099e9f6c4
|
170.2 kB | Download |
md5:24bf12279f1a0fda47183904c0e4b664
|
4.3 MB | Download |
md5:efc5cdcc5f3ef052f8c25cc3d1cbad42
|
2.3 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- PMCID
- PMC11118490
- California Institute of Technology
- Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Institute for Neuroscience
- National Institutes of Health
- NIH Predoctoral Fellowship T32 NS105595
- National Institutes of Health
- U01NS123127
- Caltech groups
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Institute for Neuroscience